Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: (no subject)
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: (no subject)
- From: "Scott, William N." <William.Scott(--nospam--at)veco.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:46:07 -0800
Timothy, The problem of falling snow onto a lower roof is complicated. I have seen the results of snow sliding from an upper roof onto a lower 2X deck roof in Fairbanks, Alaska. The impact fractured the timber decking and cracked the glulam joist. The design should consider snow density, depth of snow, quantify of snow, and height of fall. This is a physics problem with several assumed parameters. You can estimate the impact by following Roark's Section 15.3 (5th Ed). The impact factors will be high, but may be reduced by considering energy absorption by snow compaction and ice crushing. The safest solution is to prevent the snow from sliding by installing ice clips. regards, Bill -----Original Message----- From: Timothy Allison [mailto:t_allison(--nospam--at)illinoisalumni.org] Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 5:28 AM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: (no subject) Sorry if this is duplicate - I haven't seen it post to the listserv... In Section 7.9 of ASCE 7, the designer is directed to consider all of the snow from a sloped roof above to have fallen onto the lower roof. I have two questions regarding this: 1) Is the superimposed load from sliding snow to be applied uniformly over the lower roof? If it is tapered, where are the equations explaining how far to project the sliding snow load? 2) Is there some point that the sliding load can be neglected, based on relative elevations? If the eave of the upper roof is at a height of 12', and the lower roof at this location is only a few inches below, it seems ludicrous to think that the entire upper roof could/would actually slide down. Thanks ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- Prev by Subject: (no subject)
- Next by Subject: 1 1/8" sht'g. diaphragm values
- Previous by thread: (no subject)
- Next by thread: plan stamping
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]