Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

[Fwd: RE: FW: Sturd-I-Frame test summary]

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: FW: Sturd-I-Frame test summary
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 08:39:16 -0700
From: Zeno Martin <Zeno.Martin(--nospam--at)apawood.org>
To: "'chuckuc(--nospam--at)pacbell.net'" <chuckuc(--nospam--at)pacbell.net>
CC: Tom Skaggs <tom.skaggs(--nospam--at)apawood.org>, Bill Baker <bill.baker(--nospam--at)apawood.org>, Borjen Yeh <borjen.yeh(--nospam--at)apawood.org> 


Hi Chuck,

APA did the portal frame testing, presented in the summary sent to you, in
the late 1980's/early 1990's. At that time cyclic testing was a novelty,
therefore it was not considered - very few lab's including ours even had the
capability at that time to conduct cyclic testing. We do have plans to
conduct cyclic testing on wood portal frame designs.  

Thanks for your interest,

Zeno 

================================
Zeno Martin, P.E.
Associate Engineer
APA - The Engineered Wood Association 
253-620-7469 phone
253-565-7265 fax
================================


-----Original Message-----
From: chuckuc [mailto:chuckuc(--nospam--at)pacbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:41 PM
To: Lindsay Hiles
Subject: Re: FW: Sturd-I-Frame test summary


This looks like only monotonic testing--how come?
Chuck

Lindsay Hiles wrote:

>Here you go!
>
>Best Regards,
>Lindsay Hiles
>
>> -----Original
 Message-----
>>From: 	Zeno Martin  
>>Sent:	Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:25 PM
>>To:	Lindsay Hiles
>>Subject:	Sturd-I-Frame test summary
>>
>> <> 
>>