Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: anchor Bolts vs sst16
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: anchor Bolts vs sst16
- From: jim jensen <doublejtp(--nospam--at)yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 22:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Good Evening Nels, thanks for the heads up, though, my UBC is an 1987 book, I'll still have a look see. Veerry interesting info/questions on this board, for me, well I actually enjoy it. You all be safe out there Jim J --- "Nels Roselund, SE" <njineer(--nospam--at)att.net> wrote: > Jim, > > The 1997 UBC gives values, but the relationship > between your conditions and > the Code values is ambiguous. The Code values are > based on masonry prism > strengths, not grout strength, and, for tension > values, are dependent on > edge distance. Prism strengths are typically less > than grout strength. > > Some representative Working Stress values from > Section 2107.5 for fm = 1500 > psi, 4" edge distance tension capacity, Bt: = 970 > lb; 3" edge distance > tension capacity, Bt - 550 lb; 2" edge distance > tension capacity, Bt = 240 > lb; shear capacity, Bv = 1330 lb. > > Nels Roselund > Structural Engineer > South San Gabriel, CA > njineer(--nospam--at)att.net > > > > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* > ******* *** > * Read list FAQ at: > http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp > * > * This email was sent to you via Structural > Engineers > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) > server. To > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: > * > * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp > * > * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any > email you > * send to the list is public domain and may be > re-posted > * without your permission. Make sure you visit our > web > * site at: http://www.seaint.org > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** > ******** __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- References:
- Re: anchor Bolts vs sst16
- From: Nels Roselund, SE
- Re: anchor Bolts vs sst16
- Prev by Subject: Re: anchor Bolts vs sst16
- Next by Subject: ANGLE IRON LOAD/DEFLECT QUESTION
- Previous by thread: Re: anchor Bolts vs sst16
- Next by thread: Wood piling falsework
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]