Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: "Water in the Hole"
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: Re: "Water in the Hole"
- From: "Jason Kilgore" <jkilgore(--nospam--at)leok.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 17:08:38 -0500
|
> Also, I just want to make sure I understand you correctly.
> Has the state of Texas _not_ adopted a statewide building
> code? If not, how did they rationalize that decision?
This isn't that uncommon. Missouri doesn't have one either. And
like Texas, "third-class" counties (rural) aren't allowed to adopt one on their
own. Therefore, outside of urban areas, the engineer doesn't have any law
to back him up - just whatever ethics he/she has.
The Structural Engineers Association of Kansas and Missouri (SEAKM)
is currently working to correct this.
And who says decisions by state legislatures are rationalized?
Jason Kilgore Leigh & O'Kane, L.L.C. jkilgore(--nospam--at)leok.com 816-444-3144 816-444-9655 (FAX) |
- References:
- RE: "Water in the Hole"
- From: Tripp Howard
- RE: "Water in the Hole"
- Prev by Subject: RE: "Water in the Hole"
- Next by Subject: RE: "Water in the Hole"
- Previous by thread: RE: "Water in the Hole"
- Next by thread: RE: "Water in the Hole"
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]