Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- From: "Doug Parker" <dparker10(--nospam--at)austin.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:19:08 -0500
|
We have been asked by the city to provide a letter
stating that the cable guardrail system in a parking garage can support a 200#
load and still not allow a 4" sphere to pass through. According to the
UBC, the 200# load requirement is applicable to "handrails" not
"guardrails". Cable guardrail systems are fairly common here in
Texas. Typically, these cables are spaced at 4" on center with a 4000#
prestress force in the cable. The supports are at 15'-0" on center.
You cannot reasonably maintain a maximum clear distance of 4" when a
200# load (placed anywhere) is applied to the cable.
Has anyone else been asked to provide such a
letter?
All comments and suggestions are
appreciated.
Thank you,
Doug
|
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- From: Nick Blackburn
- RE: 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- Prev by Subject: Re: 1933 Riley Act/1935 UBC
- Next by Subject: RE: 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- Previous by thread: Open Building with Gable using ASCE 7-95
- Next by thread: RE: 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]