Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
RE: 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- From: "Nick Blackburn" <nblackburn(--nospam--at)fdgoak.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:38:56 -0700
|
We
haven't, but the interpretation by the City is correctly applied as far as the
4" sphere test goes since it is a guardrail. We have seen the requirement
before and have usually opted to provide a midspan (i.e. between the columns)
vertical support to reduce the length over which the cable spans
vertically. This support is in no way able to take car impact loads so the
horizontal span remains the column clear spacing +/-. We usually provide
the support as the cables have a tendency to relax reducing the preload and
allowing larger deflections to become possible.
That
said, if your cables are at 4"oc then they are 3 1/2" clr. If my math is
correct, you need a 270lb load or so for a 1/2" deflection assuming 20" wide
columns at 15'oc and a total cable length of 120', a 4000lb preload and
270ksi uncoated PT strand. So you could make the argument that they meet the
test. Note that the elongation calc is sensitive to preload and total
cable length, i.e. less preload or more length reduces the vertical load
required to deflect the cable 1/2". You could also do an empirical
test on an existing structure if the City will buy into that
method.
Nick Blackburn, PE
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Attn: Nick Blackburn
- From: Doug Parker
- Attn: Nick Blackburn
- References:
- 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- From: Doug Parker
- 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- Prev by Subject: 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- Next by Subject: Re: 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- Previous by thread: 200# Load on Cable Guardrail?
- Next by thread: Attn: Nick Blackburn
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]